You are doing an excellent job, and that's why I wanted to do this comparison, to try to further improve your excellent we'll be analizing this data in detail, but at first glance your evaluation is somewhat flawed. Since the AGM longer needed try to improve performance, little as possible, but now with additional features such as advanced ballistics consumes much power is needed most.

It is an old graphics engine, running on 32-bit and a very poor use of multi-cores.īut that should not relax in our efforts to improve the performance of ACE3, especially in view of the results. We all know that the performance of the simulator Arma 3 sel is far from correct. The simulator is much aground when moving the camera Zeus, micro-stutters if my bad english allows me to make me understand. In can be seen that the performance impact is severe.Ĭomment that the Minimum FPS with no mods Arma 3 Vanilla (52 FPS), are higher than the Maximum FPS with ArmA 3 + CBA + ACE3 WITHOUT modules (42 FPS) in multiplayer.Īlso say that I have noticed a marked loss of FPS using Zeus. NOTE: Tests conducted with VSYNC enabled 60FPS Maxįor resume, i make this barchat. The results can be downloaded from this link To measure the performance I used the latest version of FRAPS, with options, FPS, frametimes and Min. Graphic: Nvidia Gigabyte GTX 970 WF3OC 4GB To do this use the latest version of CBA 1.16 RC6 and ACE3 compiled version of the April 21.

Arma 3 + CBA + ACE3 with modules in multiplayer mission.

Arma 3 + CBA + ACE3 with modules in singleplayer mission.

Arma 3 + CBA + ACE3 with no modules in multiplayer mission.

Arma 3 + CBA + ACE3 with no modules in singleplayer mission.

Arma 3 vanilla without mods and multiplayer mission without modules.

Arma 3 vanilla without mods and singleplayer mission without modules.

Some modules have their default settings, and other modules are activated features of likely use would lower FPS.įor testing, I have run the simulation of these 6 ways. And just another mission, but with ACE3 modules I've seen that could affect performance and it was very likely that users will use. Two missions, one with vanilla units you see on screen, no scripts or modules of any kind. That is why I created a test mission with a controlled environment. In part this comes from the AGM itself, where performance and those reductions were reported.īut with the ACE3, loss of performance is even more pronounced. In my tests with ACE3, I have experienced a considerable reduction in FPS. FPS Benchmark comparison between Vanilla and ACE3

How to get more frames in arma 3